-0 I hope that if it passes, it won't become a habit!
On 5/31/13 8:00 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >Following our discussion on the proposal to push back the feature freeze >date for 4.2.0 [1], we have not yet achieved a clear consensus. Well... >we have already defined the "project rules" for figuring out what to do. >In out project by-laws [2], we have defined a "release plan" decision as >follows: > >> 3.4.2. Release Plan >> >> Defines the timetable and work items for a release. The plan also >> nominates a Release Manager. >> >> A lazy majority of active committers is required for approval. >> >> Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must occur >> on a project development mailing list. > >And our lazy majority is defined as: > >> 3.2.2. Lazy Majority - A lazy majority vote requires 3 binding +1 >> votes and more binding +1 votes than binding -1 votes. > >Our current plan is the starting point, so this VOTE is a vote to change >the current plan. We require a 72 hour window for this vote, so IMO we >are >in an odd position where the feature freeze date is at least extended >until >Tuesday of next week. > >Our current plan of record for 4.2.0 is at [3]. > >[1] http://markmail.org/message/vi3nsd2yo763kzua >[2] http://s.apache.org/csbylaws >[3] >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+4.2+Rele >ase > >---------------------------------------------------------------- > >I'd like to call a VOTE on the following: > >Proposal: Extend the feature freeze date for our 4.2.0 feature release >from today (2013-05-31) to 2013-06-28. All other dates following the >feature freeze date in the plan would be pushed out 4 weeks as well. > >Please respond with one of the following: > >+1 : change the plan as listed above >+/-0 : no strong opinion, but leaning + or - >-1 : do not change the plan > >This vote will remain open until Tuesday morning US eastern time. > >-chip