A release is always coming ;)  I'll try to get the 4.1.6 ball rolling on Monday.

Kind Regards,
Brandon

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 3:56 PM Elliott Sims via dev
<dev@cassandra.apache.org> wrote:
>
> Looks like this is out and there's a 5.0-rc release.  Is a 4.1.6 release with 
> a fix for CASSANDRA-19668 coming?
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 2:39 AM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The votes fails with a veto in place having made CASSANDRA-19668 an 5.0-rc 
>> blocker.
>>
>> Once 19668 lands we will need an immediate release of 4.1.6 too.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 at 06:49, Jon Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for confirming this, Blake. I agree that we should not knowingly 
>>> ship new versions with severe bugs that cause the DB to crash, regression 
>>> or not.
>>>
>>> -1 from me as well
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 1:39 AM Blake Eggleston <beggles...@apple.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Looking at the ticket, I’d say Jon’s concern is legitimate. The segfaults 
>>>> Jon is seeing are probably caused by paxos V2 when combined with off heap 
>>>> memtables for the reason Benedict suggests in the JIRA. This problem will 
>>>> continue to exist in 5.0. Unfortunately, it looks like the patch posted is 
>>>> not enough to address the issue and will need to be a bit more involved to 
>>>> properly fix the problem.
>>>>
>>>> While this is not a regression, I think Jon’s point about trie memtables 
>>>> increasing usage of off heap memtables is a good one, and anyway we 
>>>> shouldn’t be doing major releases with known process crashing bugs.
>>>>
>>>> So I’m voting -1 on this release and will work with Jon and Benedict to 
>>>> get this fixed.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> This email, including its contents and any attachment(s), may contain 
> confidential and/or proprietary information and is solely for the review and 
> use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this email in error, 
> please notify the sender and permanently delete this email, its content, and 
> any attachment(s). Any disclosure, copying, or taking of any action in 
> reliance on an email received in error is strictly prohibited.

Reply via email to