With no objections, and everything folk mentioned above in, the
cassandra-5.0 branch is cut.

Next steps are bumping trunk to 5.1 and then cutting a 5.0-alpha1

The bumping to 5.1 has a few steps involved in it, but the initial in-tree
PRs are ready for review, with CI being run, see CASSANDRA-18705



On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 at 00:00, Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 to everything stated here.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Brandon
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 5:28 PM Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The previous thread¹ on when to freeze 5.0 landed on freezing the first
> week of August, with a waiver in place for TCM and Accord to land later
> (but before October).
> >
> > With JDK8 now dropped and SAI and UCS merged, the only expected 5.0 work
> that hasn't landed is Vector search (CEP-30).
> >
> > Are there any objections to a waiver on Vector search?  All the
> groundwork: SAI and the vector type; has been merged, with all remaining
> work expected to land in August.
> >
> > I'm keen to freeze and see us shift gears – there's already SO MUCH in
> 5.0 and a long list of flakies.  It takes time and patience to triage and
> identify the bugs that hit us before GA.  The freeze is about being "mostly
> feature complete",  so we have room for things before our first beta
> (precedence is to ask).   If we hope for a GA by December, account for the
> 6 weeks turnaround time for cutting and voting on one alpha, one beta, and
> one rc release, and the quiet period that August is, we really only have
> September and October left.
> >
> > I already feel this is asking a bit of a miracle from us given how 4.1
> went (and I'm hoping I will be proven wrong).
> >
> > In addition, are there any objections to cutting an 5.0-alpha1 release
> as soon as we freeze?
> >
> > This is on the understanding vector, tcm and accord will become
> available in later alphas.  Originally the discussion¹ was waiting for
> Accord for alpha1, but a number of folk off-list have requested earlier
> alphas to help with testing.
> >
> >
> > ¹) https://lists.apache.org/thread/9c5cnn57c7oqw8wzo3zs0dkrm4f17lm3
>

Reply via email to