+1 on freeze 1st August with the suggested waiver.

Also, +1 on the idea for alpha 1, as long as we give straight upfront the
right expectations to users.

Now, when we added also JDK17 in CI, I want to encourage people to start
testing it in their test environments and give us some feedback.



On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 18:39, J. D. Jordan <jeremiah.jor...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I think this plan seems reasonable to me. +1
>
> -Jeremiah
>
> On Jul 26, 2023, at 5:28 PM, Mick Semb Wever <m...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> 
>
>
> The previous thread¹ on when to freeze 5.0 landed on freezing the first
> week of August, with a waiver in place for TCM and Accord to land later
> (but before October).
>
> With JDK8 now dropped and SAI and UCS merged, the only expected 5.0 work
> that hasn't landed is Vector search (CEP-30).
>
> Are there any objections to a waiver on Vector search?  All the
> groundwork: SAI and the vector type; has been merged, with all remaining
> work expected to land in August.
>
> I'm keen to freeze and see us shift gears – there's already SO MUCH in 5.0
> and a long list of flakies.  It takes time and patience to triage and
> identify the bugs that hit us before GA.  The freeze is about being "mostly
> feature complete",  so we have room for things before our first beta
> (precedence is to ask).   If we hope for a GA by December, account for the
> 6 weeks turnaround time for cutting and voting on one alpha, one beta, and
> one rc release, and the quiet period that August is, we really only have
> September and October left.
>
> I already feel this is asking a bit of a miracle from us given how 4.1
> went (and I'm hoping I will be proven wrong).
>
> In addition, are there any objections to cutting an 5.0-alpha1 release as
> soon as we freeze?
>
> This is on the understanding vector, tcm and accord will become available
> in later alphas.  Originally the discussion¹ was waiting for Accord for
> alpha1, but a number of folk off-list have requested earlier alphas to help
> with testing.
>
>
> ¹) https://lists.apache.org/thread/9c5cnn57c7oqw8wzo3zs0dkrm4f17lm3
>
>

Reply via email to