+1 (nb). Thank you Josh for advocating for these changes!
I am curious about how Code Contribution Guideline #2 reading "Code modifications must have been reviewed by at least one other contributor" and Guideline #3 reading "Code modifications require two +1 committer votes (can be author + reviewer)" will work in practice. Specifically, if a contributor submits a ticket reporting a bug with a patch attached and then it is reviewed by a committer and committed that would appear sufficient under Code Contribution Guideline #2 but insufficient under Code Contribution Guideline #3? I'm sorry if this was discussed before I just want to make sure going forward I properly follow the to be adopted guidelines. Thanks again! -Joey On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 8:34 AM Jon Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote: > > +1 binding > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020, 11:24 AM Jordan West <jorda...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (nb) > > > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 11:13 AM Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 10:12 AM Joshua McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Link to doc: > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Apache+Cassandra+Project+Governance > > > > > > > > Change since previous cancelled vote: > > > > "A simple majority of this electorate becomes the low-watermark for > > votes > > > > in favour necessary to pass a motion, with new PMC members added to the > > > > calculation." > > > > > > > > This previously read "super majority". We have lowered the low water > > mark > > > > to "simple majority" to balance strong consensus against risk of stall > > > due > > > > to low participation. > > > > > > > > > > > > - Vote will run through 6/24/20 > > > > - pmc votes considered binding > > > > - simple majority of binding participants passes the vote > > > > - committer and community votes considered advisory > > > > > > > > Lastly, I propose we take the count of pmc votes in this thread as our > > > > initial roll call count for electorate numbers and low watermark > > > > calculation on subsequent votes. > > > > > > > > Thanks again everyone (and specifically Benedict and Jon) for the time > > > and > > > > collaboration on this. > > > > > > > > ~Josh > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jonathan Ellis > > > co-founder, http://www.datastax.com > > > @spyced > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org