+1 (nb).

Thank you Josh for advocating for these changes!

I am curious about how Code Contribution Guideline #2 reading "Code
modifications must have been reviewed by at least one other
contributor" and Guideline #3 reading "Code modifications require two
+1 committer votes (can be author + reviewer)" will work in practice.
Specifically, if a contributor submits a ticket reporting a bug with a
patch attached and then it is reviewed by a committer and committed
that would appear sufficient under Code Contribution Guideline #2 but
insufficient under Code Contribution Guideline #3? I'm sorry if this
was discussed before I just want to make sure going forward I properly
follow the to be adopted guidelines.

Thanks again!
-Joey


On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 8:34 AM Jon Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2020, 11:24 AM Jordan West <jorda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (nb)
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 11:13 AM Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 10:12 AM Joshua McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Link to doc:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Apache+Cassandra+Project+Governance
> > > >
> > > > Change since previous cancelled vote:
> > > > "A simple majority of this electorate becomes the low-watermark for
> > votes
> > > > in favour necessary to pass a motion, with new PMC members added to the
> > > > calculation."
> > > >
> > > > This previously read "super majority". We have lowered the low water
> > mark
> > > > to "simple majority" to balance strong consensus against risk of stall
> > > due
> > > > to low participation.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >    - Vote will run through 6/24/20
> > > >    - pmc votes considered binding
> > > >    - simple majority of binding participants passes the vote
> > > >    - committer and community votes considered advisory
> > > >
> > > > Lastly, I propose we take the count of pmc votes in this thread as our
> > > > initial roll call count for electorate numbers and low watermark
> > > > calculation on subsequent votes.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again everyone (and specifically Benedict and Jon) for the time
> > > and
> > > > collaboration on this.
> > > >
> > > > ~Josh
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jonathan Ellis
> > > co-founder, http://www.datastax.com
> > > @spyced
> > >
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to