+1 binding On Sat, Jun 20, 2020, 11:24 AM Jordan West <jorda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (nb) > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 11:13 AM Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 10:12 AM Joshua McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Link to doc: > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/Apache+Cassandra+Project+Governance > > > > > > Change since previous cancelled vote: > > > "A simple majority of this electorate becomes the low-watermark for > votes > > > in favour necessary to pass a motion, with new PMC members added to the > > > calculation." > > > > > > This previously read "super majority". We have lowered the low water > mark > > > to "simple majority" to balance strong consensus against risk of stall > > due > > > to low participation. > > > > > > > > > - Vote will run through 6/24/20 > > > - pmc votes considered binding > > > - simple majority of binding participants passes the vote > > > - committer and community votes considered advisory > > > > > > Lastly, I propose we take the count of pmc votes in this thread as our > > > initial roll call count for electorate numbers and low watermark > > > calculation on subsequent votes. > > > > > > Thanks again everyone (and specifically Benedict and Jon) for the time > > and > > > collaboration on this. > > > > > > ~Josh > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jonathan Ellis > > co-founder, http://www.datastax.com > > @spyced > > >
