Jeff, the use of the terms "business concerns" and "technical merit" may be an unfortunate choice I made, they can be construed in a narrower way than I intended and i apologise Jeff for that confusion. Our community and how we look after it does matter.
The hope I raised was only that we deal with the proposals objectively, Sylvain's last paragraph was a good example of that and the best thing I've read in the thread so far. > Don't get me wrong, protocol-impacting changes/additions are very much > welcome if reasonable for Cassandra, and both CASSANDRA-14311 and > CASSANDRA-2848 are > certainly worthy. Both the definition of done of those ticket certainly > include the server implementation imo regards, Mick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
