> I’m not sure it makes sense to have separate features/stability releases in 
> that world. 4.0.x will be stable, every 4.x will be a dev release on the road 
> to 5.0.
>
+1. Much easier to understand and it's 'backwards compatible' (sort
of) with wherever we leave 3.x.

Still keeping 4.x on monthly cadence should keep the small, incremental focus.

Reply via email to