I’m not sure it makes sense to have separate features/stability releases in that world. 4.0.x will be stable, every 4.x will be a dev release on the road to 5.0.
-- AY On 20 October 2016 at 22:43:19, Jeff Jirsa (jji...@apache.org) wrote: On 2016-10-20 14:21 (-0700), Jeremiah Jordan <jerem...@datastax.com> wrote: > In the original tick tock plan we would not have kept 4.0.x around. So I am > proposing a change for that and then we label the 3.x and 4.x releases as > "development releases" or some other thing and have "yearly" LTS releases > with .0.x. > Those are similar to the previous 1.2/2.0/2.1/2.2 and we are adding semi > stable development releases as well which give people an easier way to try > out new stuff than "build it yourself", which was the only way to do that in > between the previous Big Bang releases. > This sounds reasonable to me. Would 4.(even) still be features and 4.(odd) still be stability fixes? Or everything in 4.x is features and/or stability?
