My thinking was we keep doing tick/tock for the 4.x. Basically continue on for 4.0.x / 4.x like we have been with 3.0.x / 3.x, just with some added guidance to people that 4.x is “development releases”. The main problem I hear with the tick tock stuff is that we won’t ever have “LTS” branches any more. So lets change that and make the .0 releases LTS branches.
-Jeremiah > On Oct 20, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Jeff Jirsa <jji...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On 2016-10-20 14:21 (-0700), Jeremiah Jordan <jerem...@datastax.com> wrote: >> In the original tick tock plan we would not have kept 4.0.x around. So I am >> proposing a change for that and then we label the 3.x and 4.x releases as >> "development releases" or some other thing and have "yearly" LTS releases >> with .0.x. >> Those are similar to the previous 1.2/2.0/2.1/2.2 and we are adding semi >> stable development releases as well which give people an easier way to try >> out new stuff than "build it yourself", which was the only way to do that in >> between the previous Big Bang releases. >> > > This sounds reasonable to me. Would 4.(even) still be features and 4.(odd) > still be stability fixes? Or everything in 4.x is features and/or stability? >
