Thanks Andrey, +1

Il giorno sab 12 feb 2022 alle ore 00:28 Andrey Yegorov <
andrey.yego...@datastax.com> ha scritto:

> I think it is time to resume this conversation.
> It looks like the PRs we were waiting for are merged.
> I added a couple of PRs that fix flaky tests etc.
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3032
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3043
> are the ones left at the moment.
>
> Also there is a fix for the situation with uneven thread usage on
> OrderedExecutor due to ledger ids being (mostly?) even.
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3023
> Please let me know if you feel comfortable with this change.
>
> I'll start going through the PRs/merging what's approved next week.
> Please help with reviews/rebasing if needed.
>
> Assuming we don't have blocking issues it's time for the release.
> I'll volunteer as a release manager unless there are objections or other
> volunteers.
> I may need some help with the release, we moved to gradle and didn't update
> the release guide from maven.
> We'll see how it goes.
> https://bookkeeper.apache.org/community/release_guide/
>
> Action items:
>
> 1. Please review open PRs (we have 88 at the moment) and approve or request
> changes.
> Committers are welcome to merge approved PRs.
>
> 2. Reply yey/nay for the release. Let the blockers be known.
>
> 3. Reply if you want to be a release manager or ok with me doing the
> release.
>
> Thank you!
> Andrey.
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:57 AM Nicolò Boschi <boschi1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I think it's worth to wait for
> > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2937, at least for 4.15
> >
> > BTW we should focus on releasing other active branches cherry-picking the
> > patch for SLF4J vulnerability
> >
> > Nicolò Boschi
> >
> > Il Lun 13 Dic 2021, 20:32 Andrey Yegorov <andrey.yego...@datastax.com>
> ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1949 has merge conflicts and
> > > multiple comments not addressed in almost two years.
> > > I don't know if we can expect Rajan to commit to getting that into a
> > > mergeable state fast enough.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 3:03 AM Hang Chen <chenh...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > We'd better include this PR into 4.15
> > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1949
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Hang
> > > >
> > > > Jack Vanlightly <jack.vanligh...@gmail.com> 于2021年12月13日周一 18:59写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > The original BP-44 was running without the journal but by mistake I
> > > also
> > > > > created the observability changes as BP-44 as well so I changed the
> > > > running
> > > > > without the journal to BP-46.
> > > > >
> > > > > BP-44 is all in. I have submitted the PR for BP-46 but there are
> test
> > > > > failures I need to fix, so very close there.
> > > > >
> > > > > I can get BP-46 ready for review hopefully by end of day tomorrow
> > > > (14th). I
> > > > > don't have a strong opinion either way, on waiting for that vs
> > cutting
> > > a
> > > > > release now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jack
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:38 AM Enrico Olivelli <
> > eolive...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I can't see any pending PR for BP-44, is it completed ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Enrico
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Il giorno lun 13 dic 2021 alle ore 11:05 Prashant Kumar <
> > > > > > prashant.kumar.si...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > We are good to go. I think we are waiting for BP-44.
> > > > > > > If we get a green light there. We are good to go as far as I
> > could
> > > > tell.
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > -Prashant
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 2:02 AM Enrico Olivelli <
> > > eolive...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello folks,
> > > > > > > > I believe it is time for cutting the 4.15 release.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Gradle migration is in good shape (please anyone correct
> me
> > > if
> > > > I am
> > > > > > > > wrong).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The "Skip journal" BP is still in progress but we are too
> late
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > Schedule.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thoughts ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Enrico
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrey Yegorov
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrey Yegorov
>


-- 
Nicolò Boschi

Reply via email to