Summary of IRC Meeting in #aurora at Mon Nov 3 19:00:53 2014: Attendees: dnorris, wickman, jfarrell, jcohen, wfarner, jaybuff, mkhutornenko, dlester
- Preface - 0.6.0 release status IRC log follows: ## Preface ## [Mon Nov 3 19:01:13 2014] <wfarner>: welcome, folks - kicking off this week's community meeting [Mon Nov 3 19:01:22 2014] <wfarner>: roll call? [Mon Nov 3 19:01:23 2014] <wfarner>: here [Mon Nov 3 19:01:25 2014] <jaybuff>: here [Mon Nov 3 19:01:28 2014] <dlester>: present [Mon Nov 3 19:01:29 2014] <jfarrell>: here [Mon Nov 3 19:01:30 2014] <jcohen>: here [Mon Nov 3 19:01:38 2014] <dnorris>: here [Mon Nov 3 19:01:45 2014] <wickman>: eeee [Mon Nov 3 19:02:45 2014] <wfarner>: while any remaining people trickle in, any topic proposals? [Mon Nov 3 19:03:05 2014] <wfarner>: i'll be giving an update on the 0.6.0 release status [Mon Nov 3 19:04:16 2014] <mkhutornenko>: here [Mon Nov 3 19:05:55 2014] <wfarner>: ok, looks like we have a short agenda today :-) ## 0.6.0 release status ## [Mon Nov 3 19:06:04 2014] <wfarner>: AURORA-711 [Mon Nov 3 19:06:54 2014] <wfarner>: there were a few minor hiccups with getting a usable RC last week, should all be ironed out. i have an RC that i'm testing locally, and if all goes well with end-to-end testing, will initiate a vote by EOD [Mon Nov 3 19:07:54 2014] <wfarner>: my only minor concern is a potential compatibility issue raised by bhuvan [Mon Nov 3 19:07:58 2014] <wfarner>: AURORA-898 [Mon Nov 3 19:08:19 2014] <wfarner>: bhuvan jaybuff are both of you confident that the issues are unrelated to custom code applied on top of Aurora? [Mon Nov 3 19:09:00 2014] <jaybuff>: bhuvan's been driving it [Mon Nov 3 19:09:23 2014] <jaybuff>: bhuvan: do you have an update? [Mon Nov 3 19:10:11 2014] <jaybuff>: i can ask him this afternoon and get him to update the ticket with status and if he thinks it should block the release [Mon Nov 3 19:10:19 2014] <jaybuff>: if not I can dig into it [Mon Nov 3 19:10:34 2014] <wfarner>: just noticed this in some log output: ExecutorConfig(name:BLANKED, data:BLANKED) [Mon Nov 3 19:10:42 2014] <wfarner>: i assume there is custom executor code in the mix? [Mon Nov 3 19:11:33 2014] <wfarner>: if so, that makes things sufficiently murky that we will need a smoking gun pointing at our code, since the executor is responsible for transitioning tasks out of ASSIGNED [Mon Nov 3 19:12:41 2014] <jaybuff>: i'm pretty sure we haven't changed the executor [Mon Nov 3 19:12:59 2014] <mkhutornenko>: wfarner: that's what we print out in LoggingInterceptor [Mon Nov 3 19:13:37 2014] <wfarner>: mkhutornenko: aha, that's right - i wasn't aware we mask the executor name even, not sure why that's the case [Mon Nov 3 19:13:49 2014] <wfarner>: we can continue this discussion after, i'm going to continue the RC, we can revisit if we pin down the problem [Mon Nov 3 19:13:56 2014] <jaybuff>: +1 [Mon Nov 3 19:14:02 2014] <wfarner>: that's it for the RC update, any last-minute topics? [Mon Nov 3 19:15:06 2014] <wfarner>: thanks, folks, see you all next week [Mon Nov 3 19:15:09 2014] <wfarner>: ASFBot: meeting stop Meeting ended at Mon Nov 3 19:15:09 2014
