Summary of IRC Meeting in #aurora at Mon Jan 12 19:02:01 2015: Attendees: dlester_, lexinator, wickman, t3hSteve, jcohen, wfarner, Yasumoto, kts, mkhutornenko, jfarrell, zmanji
- Preface - 0.7.0 release - docker support - client help output - style guide IRC log follows: ## Preface ## [Mon Jan 12 19:03:04 2015] <jcohen>: morning all [Mon Jan 12 19:03:05 2015] <wfarner>: Let's start with a roll call, committers and all [Mon Jan 12 19:03:08 2015] <wfarner>: here [Mon Jan 12 19:03:10 2015] <jcohen>: here [Mon Jan 12 19:03:13 2015] <t3hSteve>: here [Mon Jan 12 19:03:20 2015] <mkhutornenko>: here [Mon Jan 12 19:03:28 2015] <dlester_>: present [Mon Jan 12 19:03:59 2015] <wickman>: h [Mon Jan 12 19:04:07 2015] <zmanji>: here [Mon Jan 12 19:04:56 2015] <wfarner>: And to open, i'd like to welcome Florian from gutefrage.net to our list of Aurora users https://reviews.apache.org/r/29797/ [Mon Jan 12 19:05:22 2015] <wfarner>: Great to see patches coming from more people, and more companies using Aurora! [Mon Jan 12 19:05:27 2015] <kts>: here [Mon Jan 12 19:05:45 2015] <lexinator>: awake ## 0.7.0 release ## [Mon Jan 12 19:06:33 2015] <wfarner>: AURORA-872 [Mon Jan 12 19:06:41 2015] <wfarner>: mkhutornenko: can you give an update? [Mon Jan 12 19:07:17 2015] <mkhutornenko>: almost all of the tickets are resolved [Mon Jan 12 19:07:24 2015] <jfarrell>: slightly late but here [Mon Jan 12 19:07:35 2015] <mkhutornenko>: there is a new blocker that I'd like to see fixed before we can cut a release [Mon Jan 12 19:08:01 2015] <mkhutornenko>: AURORA-996 [Mon Jan 12 19:08:05 2015] <mkhutornenko>: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-996 [Mon Jan 12 19:08:17 2015] <mkhutornenko>: this is a minor fix though and should be fixed shortly [Mon Jan 12 19:08:29 2015] <mkhutornenko>: other than that, we should be good to go by the EOW [Mon Jan 12 19:08:34 2015] <wfarner>: mkhutornenko: can you be sure to link it against the RC ticket? [Mon Jan 12 19:08:58 2015] <mkhutornenko>: yup, just did [Mon Jan 12 19:09:23 2015] <wfarner>: thanks ## docker support ## [Mon Jan 12 19:09:44 2015] <t3hSteve>: just submitted hopefully the last change request :) [Mon Jan 12 19:09:44 2015] <wfarner>: this is also relevant to 0.7.0, currently a feature that may make it into the release [Mon Jan 12 19:09:46 2015] <wfarner>: AURORA-633 [Mon Jan 12 19:10:43 2015] <mkhutornenko>: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-633 [Mon Jan 12 19:11:37 2015] <wfarner>: t3hSteve: do you plan to add a docker case to the end-to-end test? [Mon Jan 12 19:11:50 2015] <wfarner>: IMO that would really put a bow on it [Mon Jan 12 19:11:52 2015] <t3hSteve>: oh yes, I'll add that today as well [Mon Jan 12 19:11:56 2015] <t3hSteve>: good call [Mon Jan 12 19:11:57 2015] <wfarner>: fantastic! [Mon Jan 12 19:12:05 2015] <wfarner>: if you want, you can do that in a separate review [Mon Jan 12 19:12:17 2015] <t3hSteve>: ok, will do [Mon Jan 12 19:12:19 2015] <wfarner>: but we should have that follow in short succession [Mon Jan 12 19:12:33 2015] <t3hSteve>: sounds good [Mon Jan 12 19:12:39 2015] <t3hSteve>: I'm excited! [Mon Jan 12 19:12:42 2015] <kts>: +1, minimize bitrot [Mon Jan 12 19:13:18 2015] <t3hSteve>: also this review is getting so big its slowing down RB ;) [Mon Jan 12 19:13:47 2015] <wfarner>: let's chat offline after, i'll make sure to point out how to do a dependent review with rbt [Mon Jan 12 19:14:00 2015] <t3hSteve>: great, thanks [Mon Jan 12 19:14:15 2015] <wfarner>: does anyone else have a topic they would like to bring up? ## client help output ## [Mon Jan 12 19:15:38 2015] <wfarner>: more of a heads up than anything else - i changed the help output of the client last week [Mon Jan 12 19:15:39 2015] <wfarner>: AURORA-994 [Mon Jan 12 19:15:57 2015] <wfarner>: if you're used to running 'aurora help', you'll need to start using 'aurora -h' [Mon Jan 12 19:15:59 2015] <jcohen>: itâs *so* much better [Mon Jan 12 19:16:21 2015] <wfarner>: i believe all docs have been updated, but please be on the lookout [Mon Jan 12 19:18:03 2015] <wfarner>: that's all i've got, last call for topics ## style guide ## [Mon Jan 12 19:19:27 2015] <jfarrell>: right now we link back to twitter for the style guide, is this changes or gets moved we would have broken links. thoughts on copying these guides into our docs folder [Mon Jan 12 19:19:59 2015] <wfarner>: +1 [Mon Jan 12 19:20:13 2015] <Yasumoto>: I'd prefer to point to a canonical location if possible, but I hadn't thought of that jfarrell [Mon Jan 12 19:20:15 2015] <dlester_>: jfarrell: fine by me, although it would be nice of the Twitter style guide was versioned in some way to keep the two in sync.. [Mon Jan 12 19:20:15 2015] <kts>: worth doing, as we'd need to ratify changes via discussion anyway [Mon Jan 12 19:20:25 2015] <wfarner>: gives us latitude to amend it [Mon Jan 12 19:20:37 2015] <dlester_>: true [Mon Jan 12 19:20:40 2015] <wfarner>: downside is that it will be difficult to discern how ours differs from Twitter's, though that may not matter [Mon Jan 12 19:20:55 2015] <Yasumoto>: dlester's versioning suggestion is interesting [Mon Jan 12 19:21:11 2015] <kts>: we definitely deviate already somewhat (usually we're more specific) [Mon Jan 12 19:21:15 2015] <Yasumoto>: but yeah, you'd pretty much need to run diff which is less than ideal [Mon Jan 12 19:21:33 2015] <Yasumoto>: +1 to pulling in a copy for us [Mon Jan 12 19:22:05 2015] <kts>: for example, we're stricter on placement of @Override annotations [Mon Jan 12 19:22:32 2015] <kts>: so +1 to a copy from me [Mon Jan 12 19:22:47 2015] <jfarrell>: i just want to keep all the docs in one place, having to go to other sources for style and then for ⦠makes it a lot harder for someone new to get up to speed [Mon Jan 12 19:23:34 2015] <jfarrell>: jcohen: you had started on this patch, mind coping the docs over and referencing where we got them from [Mon Jan 12 19:23:49 2015] <wfarner>: jfarrell: in the case of something like google's style guide, though, i argue it might be easier to ramp [Mon Jan 12 19:24:01 2015] <jcohen>: Iâll file a ticket to track it [Mon Jan 12 19:24:29 2015] <zmanji>: To diverge slightly, can we enforce the contents of the style guide via checkstyle or PMD? [Mon Jan 12 19:24:58 2015] <wfarner>: zmanji: we should certainly try, insomuch as we don't end up decorating our code with style check disablers [Mon Jan 12 19:25:21 2015] <kts>: meta-style rule: no style checker annotations? [Mon Jan 12 19:25:30 2015] <wfarner>: however, i've admitted defeat on the front of completely tool-enforced style [Mon Jan 12 19:25:37 2015] <jcohen>: AURORA-1000 [Mon Jan 12 19:25:38 2015] <wfarner>: kts: giant +1 [Mon Jan 12 19:25:44 2015] <jcohen>: #off I win! [Mon Jan 12 19:27:28 2015] <jfarrell>: any other topics? [Mon Jan 12 19:29:06 2015] <wfarner>: thanks, everyone [Mon Jan 12 19:29:10 2015] <wfarner>: ASFBot: meeting stop Meeting ended at Mon Jan 12 19:29:10 2015
