+1 (binding) On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 10:14 PM Dewey Dunnington <dewey.dunning...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)! > > On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 10:42 PM Ian Cook <ianmc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Ian > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 9:51 PM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Fri, May 2, 2025, at 08:00, Joel Lubinitsky wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > Thanks for putting this together Matt. > > > > > > > > Joel > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 1:39 PM Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hey All, > > > >> > > > >> I would like to propose extending the semantics for Flight RPC > > > >> Location URI messages as documented in a PR [1] currently filed on > the > > > >> main Arrow Repo. > > > >> > > > >> Previous discussions can be found at [2] and [3]. After discussion > on > > > >> the PR, the entirety of the change mostly boils down to allowing the > > > >> URI to be an HTTP or HTTPS URL that a client would make a GET > request > > > >> against to retrieve the data as a file (Arrow IPC Stream, Parquet, > or > > > >> otherwise) identified by the content-type header. > > > >> > > > >> See the changes in the PR [1] for the specifics and other semantic > > > >> information such as handling Auth, Accept headers, Cloud Storage, > and > > > >> so on. > > > >> > > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Accept this proposal > > > >> [ ] +0 > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not extend flight location URIs because... > > > >> > > > >> Thanks everyone! > > > >> > > > >> --Matt > > > >> > > > >> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46194 > > > >> [2]: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/y4sb8fvftbv3x72pzqofcb0m43zd1j9j > > > >> [3]: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/qmgfzy8ofrdk6bv1rknnnj2ls5cqytzq > > > >> > > > > > >
