+1 (non-binding) Thanks for putting this together Matt.
Joel On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 1:39 PM Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey All, > > I would like to propose extending the semantics for Flight RPC > Location URI messages as documented in a PR [1] currently filed on the > main Arrow Repo. > > Previous discussions can be found at [2] and [3]. After discussion on > the PR, the entirety of the change mostly boils down to allowing the > URI to be an HTTP or HTTPS URL that a client would make a GET request > against to retrieve the data as a file (Arrow IPC Stream, Parquet, or > otherwise) identified by the content-type header. > > See the changes in the PR [1] for the specifics and other semantic > information such as handling Auth, Accept headers, Cloud Storage, and > so on. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Accept this proposal > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 Do not extend flight location URIs because... > > Thanks everyone! > > --Matt > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46194 > [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/y4sb8fvftbv3x72pzqofcb0m43zd1j9j > [3]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/qmgfzy8ofrdk6bv1rknnnj2ls5cqytzq >
