+1 (binding)
On Fri, May 2, 2025, at 08:00, Joel Lubinitsky wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks for putting this together Matt. > > Joel > > On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 1:39 PM Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey All, >> >> I would like to propose extending the semantics for Flight RPC >> Location URI messages as documented in a PR [1] currently filed on the >> main Arrow Repo. >> >> Previous discussions can be found at [2] and [3]. After discussion on >> the PR, the entirety of the change mostly boils down to allowing the >> URI to be an HTTP or HTTPS URL that a client would make a GET request >> against to retrieve the data as a file (Arrow IPC Stream, Parquet, or >> otherwise) identified by the content-type header. >> >> See the changes in the PR [1] for the specifics and other semantic >> information such as handling Auth, Accept headers, Cloud Storage, and >> so on. >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 Accept this proposal >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 Do not extend flight location URIs because... >> >> Thanks everyone! >> >> --Matt >> >> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46194 >> [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/y4sb8fvftbv3x72pzqofcb0m43zd1j9j >> [3]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/qmgfzy8ofrdk6bv1rknnnj2ls5cqytzq >>
