In light of the discussion on
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3630 I think we should wait until
we have a "not broken" JavaScript-only release on NPM and have
confidence that we can respond to the community's needs

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:24 PM Paul Taylor <ptay...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I agree, the JS has matured a lot in the last few months. I think it's
> ready to join the regular Arrow releases. Let me know if I can help
> integrate the publish scripts :-)
>
> The two main things in progress are docs + Vector Builders, neither of
> which should block this release.
>
> We're going to try to get the docs/recipes ready for a PR this weekend.
> If that lands shortly after 0.13.0 goes out, would it be possible to
> update the website independently, or would that need to wait until 0.14?
>
> Paul
>
> On 3/19/19 10:08 AM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> > I'm in favor of including JS in the 0.13.0 release.
> >
> > I'm going to try to fix a couple of the Python Parquet bugs until the
> > RC is ready to be cut, but none of them need block the release.
> >
> > Seems like we need someone else to volunteer to be the RM for 0.13 if
> > Uwe is unavailable next week. Antoine -- are you possibly up for it
> > (the initial setup will be a bit painful)? I don't have access to a
> > machine with my code signing key on it until next week so I cannot do
> > it
> >
> > - Wes
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 9:46 AM Kouhei Sutou <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> There are no blockers on GLib, Ruby and Linux packages.
> >>
> >> Can we include JavaScript into 0.13.0?
> >> If we include JavaScript into 0.13.0, we can remove
> >> codes to release JavaScript separately. For example, we can
> >> remove dev/release/js-*. We can enable version update code
> >> in dev/release/00-prepare.sh:
> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/dev/release/00-prepare.sh#L67-L74
> >>
> >> We can merge "JavaScript Releases" document into our release
> >> document:
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Release+Management+Guide#ReleaseManagementGuide-JavaScriptReleases
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> kou
> >>
> >> In <cajpuwmbgjzbwrwybwse6bd9lnn_7xozn_aq2job9_mpvmhc...@mail.gmail.com>
> >>    "Re: Timeline for 0.13 Arrow release" on Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:51:12 
> >> -0500,
> >>    Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> hi folks,
> >>>
> >>> I think we're basically at the 0.13 end game here. There's some more
> >>> patches can get in, but do we all think we can cut an RC by the end of
> >>> the week? What are the blocking issues?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Wes
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 9:57 PM Kouhei Sutou <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>>> Submitted the packaging builds:
> >>>>> https://github.com/kszucs/crossbow/branches/all?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=build-452
> >>>> I've fixed .deb/.rpm packages: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3934
> >>>> It has been merged.
> >>>> So .deb/.rpm packages are ready for release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> --
> >>>> kou
> >>>>
> >>>> In <cahm19a5somzxgcphc6ee-mr2usvvhwb252udgjrvocq-cb2...@mail.gmail.com>
> >>>>    "Re: Timeline for 0.13 Arrow release" on Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:24:43 
> >>>> +0100,
> >>>>    Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Submitted the packaging builds:
> >>>>> https://github.com/kszucs/crossbow/branches/all?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=build-452
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 4:19 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> 
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The CMake refactor is merged! Kudos to Uwe for 3+ weeks of hard labor 
> >>>>>> on
> >>>>>> this.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We should run all the packaging tasks and get a full accounting of
> >>>>>> what is broken so we aren't surprised during the release process
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 9:39 AM Krisztián Szűcs
> >>>>>> <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> The proof of the pudding is in the eating. You convinced me.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 3:31 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Krisztian -- are you all right with proceeding with merging the CMake
> >>>>>>>> refactor? I'm pretty committed to helping fix the problems that come
> >>>>>>>> up. Since most consumers of the project don't test until _after_ a
> >>>>>>>> release, we won't find out about some problems until we merge it and
> >>>>>>>> release it. Thus, IMHO it doesn't make sense to wait another 8-10
> >>>>>>>> weeks since we'd be delaying feedback for that long. There are also a
> >>>>>>>> number of follow-on issues blocking on the refactor
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:39 AM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> I've cleaned up my issues for Rust, moving most of them to 0.14.0.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I have two PRs in progress that I would appreciate reviews on:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3671 - [Rust] Table API (a.k.a
> >>>>>>>>> DataFrame)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3851 - [Rust] Parquet data
> >>>>>> source
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>> DataFusion
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Once these are merged I have some small follow up PRs for 0.13.0
> >>>>>> that I
> >>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>> get done this week.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Andy.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 8:21 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> hi folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I think we are on track to be able to release toward the end of
> >>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>> month. My proposed timeline:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> * This week (March 11-15): feature/improvement push mostly
> >>>>>>>>>> * Next week (March 18-22): shift to bug fixes, stabilization, empty
> >>>>>>>>>> backlog of feature/improvement JIRAs
> >>>>>>>>>> * Week of March 25: propose release candidate
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Does this seem reasonable? This puts us at about 9-10 weeks from
> >>>>>> 0.12.
> >>>>>>>>>> We need an RM for 0.13, any PMCs want to volunteer?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Take a look at our release page:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103091219
> >>>>>>>>>> Out of the open or in-progress issues, we have:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> * C#: 3 issues
> >>>>>>>>>> * C++ (all components): 51 issues
> >>>>>>>>>> * Java: 3 issues
> >>>>>>>>>> * Python: 38 issues
> >>>>>>>>>> * Rust (all components): 33 issues
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Please help curating the backlogs for each component. There's a
> >>>>>>>>>> smattering of issues in other categories. There are also 10 open
> >>>>>>>>>> issues with No Component (and 20 resolved issues), those need their
> >>>>>>>>>> metadata fixed.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>> Wes
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:49 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> The timeline for the 0.13 release is drawing closer. I would say
> >>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>> should consider a release candidate either the week of March 18
> >>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>> March 25, which gives us ~3 weeks to close out backlog items.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> There are around 220 issues open or in-progress in
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Arrow+0.13.0+Release
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please have a look. If issues are not assigned to someone as the
> >>>>>> next
> >>>>>>>>>>> couple of weeks pass by I'll begin moving at least C++ and Python
> >>>>>>>>>>> issues to 0.14 that don't seem like they're going to get done for
> >>>>>>>>>>> 0.13. If development stakeholders for C#, Java, Rust, Ruby, and
> >>>>>> other
> >>>>>>>>>>> components can review and curate the issues that would be
> >>>>>> helpful.
> >>>>>>>>>>> You can help keep the JIRA issues tidy by making sure to add Fix
> >>>>>>>>>>> Version to issues and to make sure to add a Component so that
> >>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>> are properly categorized in the release notes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>>>>> Wes
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:39 AM Wes McKinney <
> >>>>>> wesmck...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> See
> >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Release+Management+Guide
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The source release step is one of the places where problems
> >>>>>> occur.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 10:33 AM <ane...@quiltdata.io wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 8, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Uwe L. Korn <m...@uwekorn.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could dockerize some of the release steps to ensure that
> >>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>> run in the same environment.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I may be able to help with said Dockerization. If not for this
> >>>>>>>>>> release, then for the next. Are there docs on which systems we
> >>>>>> wish to
> >>>>>>>>>> target and/or any build steps beyond the current dev container (
> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/master/dev/container)?
> >>>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to