I agree, the JS has matured a lot in the last few months. I think it's ready to join the regular Arrow releases. Let me know if I can help integrate the publish scripts :-)

The two main things in progress are docs + Vector Builders, neither of which should block this release.

We're going to try to get the docs/recipes ready for a PR this weekend. If that lands shortly after 0.13.0 goes out, would it be possible to update the website independently, or would that need to wait until 0.14?

Paul

On 3/19/19 10:08 AM, Wes McKinney wrote:
I'm in favor of including JS in the 0.13.0 release.

I'm going to try to fix a couple of the Python Parquet bugs until the
RC is ready to be cut, but none of them need block the release.

Seems like we need someone else to volunteer to be the RM for 0.13 if
Uwe is unavailable next week. Antoine -- are you possibly up for it
(the initial setup will be a bit painful)? I don't have access to a
machine with my code signing key on it until next week so I cannot do
it

- Wes

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 9:46 AM Kouhei Sutou <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
Hi,

There are no blockers on GLib, Ruby and Linux packages.

Can we include JavaScript into 0.13.0?
If we include JavaScript into 0.13.0, we can remove
codes to release JavaScript separately. For example, we can
remove dev/release/js-*. We can enable version update code
in dev/release/00-prepare.sh:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/dev/release/00-prepare.sh#L67-L74

We can merge "JavaScript Releases" document into our release
document:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Release+Management+Guide#ReleaseManagementGuide-JavaScriptReleases


Thanks,
--
kou

In <cajpuwmbgjzbwrwybwse6bd9lnn_7xozn_aq2job9_mpvmhc...@mail.gmail.com>
   "Re: Timeline for 0.13 Arrow release" on Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:51:12 -0500,
   Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:

hi folks,

I think we're basically at the 0.13 end game here. There's some more
patches can get in, but do we all think we can cut an RC by the end of
the week? What are the blocking issues?

Thanks
Wes

On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 9:57 PM Kouhei Sutou <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
Hi,

Submitted the packaging builds:
https://github.com/kszucs/crossbow/branches/all?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=build-452
I've fixed .deb/.rpm packages: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3934
It has been merged.
So .deb/.rpm packages are ready for release.

Thanks,
--
kou

In <cahm19a5somzxgcphc6ee-mr2usvvhwb252udgjrvocq-cb2...@mail.gmail.com>
   "Re: Timeline for 0.13 Arrow release" on Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:24:43 +0100,
   Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote:

Submitted the packaging builds:
https://github.com/kszucs/crossbow/branches/all?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=build-452

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 4:19 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:

The CMake refactor is merged! Kudos to Uwe for 3+ weeks of hard labor on
this.

We should run all the packaging tasks and get a full accounting of
what is broken so we aren't surprised during the release process

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 9:39 AM Krisztián Szűcs
<szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote:
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. You convinced me.

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 3:31 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Krisztian -- are you all right with proceeding with merging the CMake
refactor? I'm pretty committed to helping fix the problems that come
up. Since most consumers of the project don't test until _after_ a
release, we won't find out about some problems until we merge it and
release it. Thus, IMHO it doesn't make sense to wait another 8-10
weeks since we'd be delaying feedback for that long. There are also a
number of follow-on issues blocking on the refactor

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:39 AM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I've cleaned up my issues for Rust, moving most of them to 0.14.0.

I have two PRs in progress that I would appreciate reviews on:

https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3671 - [Rust] Table API (a.k.a
DataFrame)

https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3851 - [Rust] Parquet data
source
in
DataFusion

Once these are merged I have some small follow up PRs for 0.13.0
that I
can
get done this week.

Thanks,

Andy.


On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 8:21 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
wrote:
hi folks,

I think we are on track to be able to release toward the end of
this
month. My proposed timeline:

* This week (March 11-15): feature/improvement push mostly
* Next week (March 18-22): shift to bug fixes, stabilization, empty
backlog of feature/improvement JIRAs
* Week of March 25: propose release candidate

Does this seem reasonable? This puts us at about 9-10 weeks from
0.12.
We need an RM for 0.13, any PMCs want to volunteer?

Take a look at our release page:


https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103091219
Out of the open or in-progress issues, we have:

* C#: 3 issues
* C++ (all components): 51 issues
* Java: 3 issues
* Python: 38 issues
* Rust (all components): 33 issues

Please help curating the backlogs for each component. There's a
smattering of issues in other categories. There are also 10 open
issues with No Component (and 20 resolved issues), those need their
metadata fixed.

Thanks,
Wes

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:49 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
wrote:
The timeline for the 0.13 release is drawing closer. I would say
we
should consider a release candidate either the week of March 18
or
March 25, which gives us ~3 weeks to close out backlog items.

There are around 220 issues open or in-progress in


https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Arrow+0.13.0+Release
Please have a look. If issues are not assigned to someone as the
next
couple of weeks pass by I'll begin moving at least C++ and Python
issues to 0.14 that don't seem like they're going to get done for
0.13. If development stakeholders for C#, Java, Rust, Ruby, and
other
components can review and curate the issues that would be
helpful.
You can help keep the JIRA issues tidy by making sure to add Fix
Version to issues and to make sure to add a Component so that
issues
are properly categorized in the release notes.

Thanks
Wes

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:39 AM Wes McKinney <
wesmck...@gmail.com>
wrote:
See
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Release+Management+Guide
The source release step is one of the places where problems
occur.
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 10:33 AM <ane...@quiltdata.io wrote:

On Feb 8, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Uwe L. Korn <m...@uwekorn.com>
wrote:
We could dockerize some of the release steps to ensure that
they
run in the same environment.
I may be able to help with said Dockerization. If not for this
release, then for the next. Are there docs on which systems we
wish to
target and/or any build steps beyond the current dev container (
https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/master/dev/container)?

Reply via email to