+1 for bi-weekly and europeen friendly times: CET (GMT+1)
> Am 09.08.2016 um 00:39 schrieb Julien Le Dem <jul...@dremio.com>: > > Also to all who are responding let me know your timezone as well. > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Sounds good to me as well. Biweekly would be preferred. >> >>> On Monday, August 8, 2016, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> hi Julien -- this sounds like a good idea, also +1 for bi-weekly. I >>> will do my best to join when possible. So far we've mostly been >>> communicating via pull request, so I think periodic syncs will be >>> helpful. >>> >>> - Wes >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:45 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com >>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> My preference would be for bi-weekly. >>>> >>>> -Taylor >>>> >>>>> On Aug 8, 2016, at 5:25 PM, Julien Le Dem <jul...@dremio.com >>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> My experience with Parquet is that a regular sync up over hangout >> helps >>>>> keeping in touch and staying updated about what everyone is doing. >>>>> I was thinking of scheduling it weekly or bi-weekly. >>>>> Who would join? >>>>> >>>>> The way it goes is first we do a round table where people introduce >>>>> themselves an list the topics they'd like to talk or hear about. >>>>> That makes the agenda and we go through it. >>>>> At the end we send notes to the mailing list with discussions and >> action >>>>> items (for example: open JIRA, comment on JIRA, review PR, etc). >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Julien > > > > -- > Julien
