Also to all who are responding let me know your timezone as well. On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds good to me as well. Biweekly would be preferred. > > On Monday, August 8, 2016, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > hi Julien -- this sounds like a good idea, also +1 for bi-weekly. I > > will do my best to join when possible. So far we've mostly been > > communicating via pull request, so I think periodic syncs will be > > helpful. > > > > - Wes > > > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:45 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > My preference would be for bi-weekly. > > > > > > -Taylor > > > > > >> On Aug 8, 2016, at 5:25 PM, Julien Le Dem <jul...@dremio.com > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi all, > > >> My experience with Parquet is that a regular sync up over hangout > helps > > >> keeping in touch and staying updated about what everyone is doing. > > >> I was thinking of scheduling it weekly or bi-weekly. > > >> Who would join? > > >> > > >> The way it goes is first we do a round table where people introduce > > >> themselves an list the topics they'd like to talk or hear about. > > >> That makes the agenda and we go through it. > > >> At the end we send notes to the mailing list with discussions and > action > > >> items (for example: open JIRA, comment on JIRA, review PR, etc). > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Julien > > > -- Julien
