Sounds good to me as well. Biweekly would be preferred. On Monday, August 8, 2016, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi Julien -- this sounds like a good idea, also +1 for bi-weekly. I > will do my best to join when possible. So far we've mostly been > communicating via pull request, so I think periodic syncs will be > helpful. > > - Wes > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 2:45 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgo...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > +1 > > > > My preference would be for bi-weekly. > > > > -Taylor > > > >> On Aug 8, 2016, at 5:25 PM, Julien Le Dem <jul...@dremio.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> My experience with Parquet is that a regular sync up over hangout helps > >> keeping in touch and staying updated about what everyone is doing. > >> I was thinking of scheduling it weekly or bi-weekly. > >> Who would join? > >> > >> The way it goes is first we do a round table where people introduce > >> themselves an list the topics they'd like to talk or hear about. > >> That makes the agenda and we go through it. > >> At the end we send notes to the mailing list with discussions and action > >> items (for example: open JIRA, comment on JIRA, review PR, etc). > >> > >> -- > >> Julien >
