On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does that sound OK? > > Sounds good to me.
Of course we'd first check when we hit the name for the (MAX + 1)th time not for the MAXth time since the former would be allowed. I wonder whether MAX = 1 would be a better default than 5. > I'd simply add a warning indicating maxSymlinkTraversal was > hit. "User" or verbose level is debatable again. Probably a good idea. > Similarly, maybe an internal flag in DS should be gettable to > possibly have client code remove duplicate entries if it wants to??? Not sure what you mean here. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
