2008/9/10 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Does that sound OK?
>>
>> Sounds good to me.
>
> Of course we'd first check when we hit the name for the (MAX + 1)th
> time not for the MAXth time since the former would be allowed. I
> wonder whether MAX = 1 would be a better default than 5.
>
>> I'd simply add a warning indicating maxSymlinkTraversal was
>> hit. "User" or verbose level is debatable again.
>
> Probably a good idea.
>
>> Similarly, maybe an internal flag in DS should be gettable to
>> possibly have client code remove duplicate entries if it wants to???
>
> Not sure what you mean here.
>
If I take the example,
I <-----\
/ \ |
/ \ |
B C |
/ \ |
/ \ |
file.txt A--/
and I start with /, with the pattern /**/*.txt, even with a
maxLevelsOfSymlinks 1, I will get
/B/file.txt
/C/A/B/file.txt
Clearly, you get twice the same file. Maybe that's not what the user
want. But which one should we choose?
--
Gilles Scokart
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
