>On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:40 PM Chris Peterson <cpeter...@mozilla.com> wrote: >> I propose that Win64 and WOW64 use the unadorned Windows UA already used >> by Firefox on x86 and AArch64 Windows: >> >> < "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:66.0) Gecko/20100101 >> Firefox/66.0" >> > "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:66.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/66.0" > >Would there be significant downsides to hard-coding the Windows >version to "10.0" in order to put Windows 7 and 8.x users in the same >anonymity set with Windows 10 users? > >(We could still publish statistics of Windows version adoption at >https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/hardware )
I wonder if any sites distributing windows executables might key off the OS version to default to the correct exe for your version of windows? If we do this, one would presume that such sites let you select alternate versions to download already. And if not, they could, but they might not bother/notice. -- Randell Jesup, Mozilla Corp remove "news" for personal email _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform