Am Dienstag, 14. Mai 2019 18:26:49 UTC+2 schrieb L. David Baron: > On Monday 2019-05-13 16:14 -0700, Chris Peterson wrote: > > On 5/11/2019 4:11 AM, j.j. wrote: > > > > < "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:66.0) Gecko/20100101 > > > > Firefox/66.0" > > > > > "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:66.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/66.0" > > > Note that "navigator.oscpu" returns "Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64" or > > > similar. This needs to change then. > > > > > > > Yes. navigator.oscpu and the UA string share some common code, so they would > > both be fixed to match 32-bit Windows. > > I think it might be worth considering letting them diverge.
Having more js information in "navigator.oscpu" than in "navigator.userAgent" could animate web developers using oscpu while in an ideal world it should be dropped completely. It's Mozilla only and endet up in the HTML spec (Gecko navigator compatibility mode) only for web compat concerns (browser detection). (BTW, chancing oscpu string requires a spec change too) _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
