Ehsan Akhgari writes:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 6:27 PM Ryan Hunt <rh...@eqrion.net> wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> So for converting from C-style to C++-style, that would be:
>>
>> /* static */ void Foo::Bar() {
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> // static
>> void Foo::Bar() {
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> My one concern would be the presence of other C++-style
>> comments before the method definition. For example [1].
>
> [...] How about detecting those cases and inserting a newline
> between the comments on the line before, for extra clarity?
>
>> [...]
>>
>> [1]
>> https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/e4b9b1084292/layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp#l1023
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On Monday, January 28, 2019 12:51 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <
>> ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> The path to least resistance for addressing this problem may be to convert
>> these into C++-style comments and therefore moving them into their own
>> lines. Would you be OK with that?
I haven't noticed clang-format enforcing its own opinions on
comments when they already follow Google style.
In my experiments clang-format is accepting this:
// Make this Foo Bar.
/* static */
void Foo::Bar() {
...
}
The /* */ style comment provides a clear separation from any other
comment on the previous line, without the need for an extra
blank-line. "don't use blank lines when you don't have to."
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
