On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Bobby Holley <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 1/16/17 4:28 PM, Matthew N. wrote: > > > >> Does it just work from XHTML documents? > >> > > > > Yes, as far as I know. > > > > Is our implementation of Web Components ready to replace it and riding > the > >> trains? > >> > > > > No. > > > > > From the perspective of the platform, my general experience is that XBL is > much, much more of a PITA than XUL itself. I would be very skeptical of a > plan to start using some form of heavily-XBL-reliant HTML. > > I have generally ambivalent feelings towards XUL, but XBL cannot die fast > enough. > Should (can) it die in the Quantum development timeframe? What does that do to shipping risk? I realize churn creates risk, but I seem to recall XBL is getting in the way for Quantum styling? Cheers, David > > bholley > > > > > > -Boris > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dev-platform mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
