On 30/12/2015 10:20, Jörg Knobloch wrote:
I can't understand how the current system could manage SCOWL removals
yet not remove words Mozilla specifically added. How does it know that a
word came from SCOWL and can be removed or it didn't come from SCOWL and
should be maintained?
Oops, I was wrong again. It knows by comparing the previous SCOWL
version with the new one. I hope I'm excused, since I even managed to
confuse Ehsan ;-)
> I'm not using the defective en-US spelling anyway.
I'm not using it and it is defective, but I'm happy to help fixing it,
and I already made a start with this discussion ;-)
Let's continue the discussion in bug 1235506.
I see the following problems which we need to solve:
1) Guarantee a "rich" dictionary for the users where no "useful"
words get removed without review. IMHO too many "good" words
were removed by the April/May 2015 merge with SCOWL data.
2) Clean-up Mozilla additions with contain many errors.
3) Feed useful Mozilla additions back to SCOWL.
Jorg K.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
