On 2014-04-02, at 14:01, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> AtomicFetchAndSub(&mRefCnt, -1); I think that I’ll join those who seem to favour member functions over statics, as you seem to prefer for some reason. If you want to avoid inventing names and such, how about copying from something that is known to work already: http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/atomic/package-summary.html .get() : T .getAndSet(T) : T .getAndIncrement() : T The Java APIs are pretty aggressive at covering all options; no need to be so complete. The names are sensible though. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
