On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Mounir Lamouri <mou...@lamouri.fr> wrote:
> > 3. APIs solving use cases which no browser vendor shipping an engine > > other Gecko is interested in at that time. In cases such as this, > > Mozilla will solicit feedback from as many relevant parties as > > possible, begin the standardization process with a relevant standards > > body, and create a test suite as part of the standards process. An > > example of this is the Push Notifications API. > > I am not a big fan of that exception. Given how fast paced the Web is > nowadays, we could easily put a lot of APIs in that category. I don't see this. Can you give some examples? > Actually, > if we ask other vendors what they think about most Firefox OS APIs, we > will very likely get no answer. Does that mean that those APIs are good > to go? > If "no answer" means "we don't care about your use cases", then we can't let that block our progress, because there are always going to be use-cases we need to solve that no other vendor is currently interested in. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * * _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
