The scope of the current proposal is what's being debated; I don't think there's shared agreement that the scope should be "detectable from web script".
Gavin On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 2013-06-26 1:38 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote: > >> The message you quote has a specific example - "Mozillians who have >> experience designing JS APIs and will have at least one representative >> from the JS team at all times" is probably not the best group to >> determine whether we should implement support for/ship SPDY, for >> example. I think it's clear the document was written with a focus on >> Web APIs, applying it more broadly to things like network protocols is >> (I think) a laudable goal, but might require some tweaks. >> > > SPDY is not detectable from web script (correct me if I'm wrong) so it's > not covered by this spec. Brian, are you objecting to the things which > does fall under the scope of the current proposal? > > Thanks! > Ehsan > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
