On Friday 2012-09-28 22:16 -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 9/28/12 10:03 PM, Seth Fowler wrote: > >On Sep 28, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote: > > > >>The point is that the patches that _do_ need to land urgently are blocked > >>on lack of resources because people are wasting too many cycles with > >>unnecesary try pushes. > > > >This sounds like a notion of priority might be helpful. > > There actually is one. It's just not that easy to set, and not > advertised much.
I also think encouraging its use could be rather dangerous; given current utilization, if we make it easy to adjust priorities, we could get to a point where getting results from try if you don't bump up priority means you wait until the weekend, or perhaps never get the results. It also means relying on people to judge the relative importance of both their work and their time to that of others. I think some people are likely to consistently overestimate and some to underestimate. I'd also just rather not get into a situation where that's required. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform