Hi Gerv,
Don't know. We probably should define a strategy of how we're going to
get web content to move towards supporting the UA without the platform
identifier, so that we don't get endlessly stuck with Android in the UA
for FF OS in the long term.
For the v1 shipment - I originally nominated a bug in triage to ship v1
with the UA without the platform identifier with the whitelist
implemented, but it got unnominated due to a need for a larger
discussion if that's what we want to do for v1. Perhaps it's time to
revisit that discussion and push for v1 support.
Sincerely,
Jason Smith
Desktop QA Engineer
Mozilla Corporation
https://quality.mozilla.org/
On 9/25/2012 5:22 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:
On 24/09/12 20:06, Jason Smith wrote:
3. For v1, we probably need to still stick to the original plan for
the UA that does include Android in the UA, even though that's
sub-optimal to receive Android specific content. We should move to
the optimal UA in long-term though without the platform identifier.
Do we really think we will be able to make this shift post-v1? Surely
shipping Firefox OS v1 with an Android-containing UA will simply embed
the problem, as lots of sites will assume that the Firefox OS UA
contains the word "Android"?
Gerv
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
