On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 08:56:09AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:59:25PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > > > > I'm not trying to sound hostile about it, it's just that it would be a > > very rude thing to do to our users. > > ?? I did never read your messages as hostile. Yuo have been extremely > gently, polite and you made as well a perfect point that i have > underestimate. > > > > > > Im working on pushing them to X.org and hopefully to get atleast an answer > > > back. If there will be no answer XFree86 will be the next step, and I > > > perfectly agree with you about a good deep review. > > > > IMO you should go XFree86 first. They are the leading implementation of > > the X Window System and have a reputation for being more responsive. > > They're certainly more open. > > Thanks for the info. I tought it was the other way around X.org -> Xfree86 > from one of the previous message, but it will cost me nothing to contact > them as well.
Please note that XFree86 has feature frozen the code base for the 4.3.0 release, so i suppose your code would be accepted only after 4.3.0 is released, i think. People may well test it earlier though. Friendly, Sven Luther
