On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 11:14:37PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 07:07:15PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> > I always had the problem with my G450 and later with my G550 that X
> > wouldn't set the gamma the same on both heads, although it claimed that it
> > was according to the log. The monitors were the same make and model, and
> > the difference was distinct and annoying.
> >
> > OTOH, xgamma was always quite willing to set the gamma on the heads
> > separately, and I was also able to specify specific gamma settings for each
> > monitor in XF86Config-4 and have them take effect.
>
> In that case I'm confused. Has there been a regression since XFree86
> 4.1 or not?
I should clarify...
When I was still using the G450/G550, X would claim that it was setting the
gamma on the two monitors identically. Anyone who looked at them, though,
would be able to tell that they were wildly different.
I used xgamma (at first) in $HOME/.xsession, and later manipulating
XF86Config-4 directly, to reduce the gamma on the second monitor, like so:
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Viewsonic PF790"
HorizSync 30-97
VertRefresh 50-180
Option "DPMS" "Yes"
Gamma 0.8 0.8 1.15
EndSection
This was the only way I could make the two of them balance. I always
chalked it up to just hardware differences in the respective video outputs
(ie they had different ideas of what gamma 1.0 meant) and got on with
things.
I haven't run either of my Matrox cards on XF 4.2.x... it's a nVidia world
in my box now (I wouldn't have, but they were free).
Sorry for any confusion I may have introduced. I think I was trying to
point out that even though they weren't being set the same (and X claimed
they were), there was still individual control on both heads.
--
Marc Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
