>> Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001212 16:39]: > > [...] and Utah's has some advantages for some people. > > And the one person who has seemed to be effected thus far did not take > the time and effort to put his packages on hold. :-P
Why should he? Package: libutahglx1 Replaces: libgl1 Provides: libgl1 Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Recommends: utah-glx Package: utah-glx Depends: xserver, libc6 (>= 2.1.2) Recommends: libutahglx1 Conflicts: xfree86-common(>=4.0) Package: xfree86-common Suggests: xserver-xfree86 | xserver apt found a solution for the upgrade, and given the information above it probably meant deinstalling xserver-svga in favour of xserver-xfree86. This is probably a bug in utah-glx. But the question still remains: why should a user put packages on hold before an upgrade? He's got a working configuration, and AFAICS it's possible to keep it. -- Marcelo
