Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > Indeed, I believe this is an Xrm issue, not necessarily a Xt one.
Well the file I referenced is the only .c or .h file in all of X that contains the string '"app-defaults"'. > Hacking X to do this seems bad. Why did upstream not have a similar redundant > search path? Remember, upstream almost never thinks about backwards compatability and incremental upgrades the way we do. -- see shy jo
