>> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ regarding the status of the new Xserver ]
> I expect it to be widely used, especially by people with recent hardware.
I'm two minds about this. Yes, the architecture of the new X server
is better. What I'm getting out of it is not. I have to sit down,
reread docs, and figure out why, but the 16 bpp mode suffers from
severe dithering on my hardware (G400). The much promotioned OpenGL
support is still in development, which is the other reason I annoyed
you so much about the .diff.gz -- I want to persue automatic building
out of cvs of the relevant stuff for Debian. On that respect, utah-glx
is still faster/easier to install/better looking/whatever.
> Some of the 3.x series X servers will continue to be provided to support
> hardware that 4.0 doesn't yet.
And utah-glx (doesn't work with 4.0 servers)
Thanks,
Marcelo
