On 2011-08-04 11:22, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 19:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 18:57:17 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> >>> libGL.so.1 is not the only file to be diverted, libglx.so is being >>> replaced by the vendors drivers, too. Or is there some way of "search >>> path magic" that would allow to place the "higher priority alternative" >>> in a different location where it would be picked up before >>> /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so ? That would allow to avoid >>> the diversion here. Something similar to /lib/modules/*/updates/ ... >>> >> That shouldn't be too hard. > > But it would result in the non-standard libglx.so being picked up even > when the standard GL(X) components are supposed to be used. So I think > libglx.so would need to be handled by the alternative as well.
The idea is still to handle the non-standard libglx.so by an alternative. This will be installed in the search path before the standard libglx.so. So we can stop diverting the standard libglx.so simplifying the whole process. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e3a91ff.4080...@abeckmann.de
