On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 05:14:57PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > You dodged my vital question again:
lol, vital... some people take Debian too seriosly ;-) > 'How is the major Mesa version number relevant for the xlibmesa > package name?' It isn't. Going from memory, the changes between 3 and 4 were mostly related to the rasterization functions, and none of those changes are visible to the application. Something similar can be said of the changes between 4 and 5. Some extensions were implemented, but because of OpenGL's design that's (or should be) irrelevant. > Something that provides xlibmesa3-gl, for example. Packages shouldn't provide xlibmesa3-gl, it should provide libgl1. -- Marcelo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
