Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 01:43:33AM +0100, Michel D?nzer scrawled:
>> A broken package name to compensate for broken assumptions? Right. Give
>> it the Mesa version then, or document it in the description, or
>> wherever.
>
> You obviously don't understand how Debian's packaging system works.
> Please come back when you understand the fact that all binary packages
> carry the version assigned to the source package, and that this is
> invariable.
Err, no, that's complete BS. Trivial counter-example: gcc-3.2.
(Search a Packages file for "Source:.*\(" for more examples)
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
