Your message dated Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:43:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#242964: www.debian.org: [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not include
key anymore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Apr 2004 23:01:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 09 16:01:57 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BC50X-0004UO-00; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:01:57 -0700
Received: from localhost (albatross [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id CB43366C5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 01:01:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fishbowl.madduck.net (pD9E93390.dip.t-dialin.net
[217.233.51.144])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "fishbowl.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified
OK))
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id D896E66A5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 01:01:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by fishbowl.madduck.net (postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2D34865D; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 01:01:53 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 01:01:52 +0200
From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not include key anymore
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.56
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable kernel 2.6.5-fishbowl i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1
--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Even though http://keyring.debian.org advertises it, fingering
db.debian.org does not return a developers public key (anymore). It
would be nice to have that functionality back.
Thanks,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-fishbowl
Locale: LANG=3Den_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE.ISO-8859-15
--=20
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAdytgIgvIgzMMSnURAqOIAJsGllCty/j9+lh0rDdO07CJCqTrgACgqdAM
i2/KEhph65pOtguGl5EKRfg=
=gty2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--5vNYLRcllDrimb99--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 242964-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2004 13:43:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 16 06:43:44 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from biedermanns.com (mail.biedermanns.com) [213.133.98.83] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BETdA-0007qJ-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 06:43:44 -0700
Received: from alfie-vivi.sil.at ([62.116.31.58] helo=tausendmorgenwald)
by mail.biedermanns.com with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BETaA-0008Fb-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:40:38 +0200
Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BETd7-0000yA-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:43:41 +0200
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:43:41 +0200
From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#242964: www.debian.org: [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not include key
anymore
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4ZLFUWh1odzi/v6L"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Editor: Vi Improved <http://www.vim.org/>
X-Signature-Color: cyan
X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.4 (Perl) <http://alfie.ist.org/projects/sigd/>
X-Face: "`Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq<>5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{Qpp"J8.<RP*P9<{{6$8%_~*:6c{)<;e:s
!:C2%IH-5:GT<,Sf3Xx}di,JDbDRH/;-eb{n`VSi*}-R2,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
{3w}E7d}+GN<|v=gDc;.c(xiy{Og_=2cy)T1J"Lu}y6Onsr
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
--4ZLFUWh1odzi/v6L
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-16 15:02]:
> reopen 242964
Thanks, but no.
> also sprach Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.04.16.1451 +0200]:
>> What part of "You can contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED]" on any
>> db.debian.org webpage did you not understand?
>=20
> Did you even read my bug and look at http://keyring.debian.org? The
> latter says:
Yes, I did. And keyring.debian.org is also not in the part the webteam
handles. Thanks for being ignorant again.
> Also, nowhere on the keyring page is [EMAIL PROTECTED] listed as contact.
And on the keyring page www.debian.org is also not listed as pseudo
package for such bugreports.
a) misleading information is not in the scope of the web team
b) db.debian.org is not in the scope of the web team
Can you explain me where your thinking failure is?
> This is a valid bugreport.
Partly. Not valid for the BTS and definitely not valid for the
www.debian.org pseudo package, thank you.
> Information on the pages are *wrong*.
And these pages do *not* have a BTS entry, thanks.
> Please don't close my bugreport before having understood and
> verified the existence of the bug.
Please don't reopen the bugreport before having understood and verified
the correct addressing of the bug.
So long,
Alfie
--=20
wow. I am a dork.
-- Martin F. Krafft, debian-devel, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=2Enet>
--4ZLFUWh1odzi/v6L
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAf+MMMU96lewVKUIRAjYfAJ4zJYEkSS8mhWwCnW2cY2z4cBM7nACeM3n6
tPHX9+z6qzSqDYWTpZ197g4=
=bZvu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--4ZLFUWh1odzi/v6L--
