Your message dated Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:51:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#242964: www.debian.org: [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not include key anymore has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Apr 2004 23:01:57 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 09 16:01:57 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BC50X-0004UO-00; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 16:01:57 -0700 Received: from localhost (albatross [127.0.0.1]) by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id CB43366C5 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 01:01:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fishbowl.madduck.net (pD9E93390.dip.t-dialin.net [217.233.51.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fishbowl.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK)) by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id D896E66A5 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 01:01:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by fishbowl.madduck.net (postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D34865D; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 01:01:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 01:01:52 +0200 From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: www.debian.org: [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not include key anymore Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 2.56 Organization: Debian GNU/Linux X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable kernel 2.6.5-fishbowl i686 X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin' X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1 --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Even though http://keyring.debian.org advertises it, fingering db.debian.org does not return a developers public key (anymore). It would be nice to have that functionality back. Thanks, -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-fishbowl Locale: LANG=3Den_GB.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE.ISO-8859-15 --=20 Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! =20 .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system =20 Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAdytgIgvIgzMMSnURAqOIAJsGllCty/j9+lh0rDdO07CJCqTrgACgqdAM i2/KEhph65pOtguGl5EKRfg= =gty2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99-- --------------------------------------- Received: (at 242964-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2004 12:51:07 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 16 05:51:07 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from biedermanns.com (mail.biedermanns.com) [213.133.98.83] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BESoF-0000hz-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:51:07 -0700 Received: from alfie-vivi.sil.at ([62.116.31.58] helo=tausendmorgenwald) by mail.biedermanns.com with asmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BESlE-00087O-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:48:00 +0200 Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BESoB-0000v2-00; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:51:03 +0200 Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:51:02 +0200 From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#242964: www.debian.org: [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not include key anymore Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="A6N2fC+uXW/VQSAv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mail-Copies-To: nobody X-Editor: Vi Improved <http://www.vim.org/> X-Signature-Color: cyan X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.4 (Perl) <http://alfie.ist.org/projects/sigd/> X-Face: "`Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq<>5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{Qpp"J8.<RP*P9<{{6$8%_~*:6c{)<;e:s !:C2%IH-5:GT<,Sf3Xx}di,JDbDRH/;-eb{n`VSi*}-R2,[EMAIL PROTECTED] {3w}E7d}+GN<|v=gDc;.c(xiy{Og_=2cy)T1J"Lu}y6Onsr User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 --A6N2fC+uXW/VQSAv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-10 01:01]: > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: normal >=20 > Even though http://keyring.debian.org advertises it, fingering > db.debian.org does not return a developers public key (anymore). It > would be nice to have that functionality back. What part of "You can contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED]" on any db.debian.org webpage did you not understand? Have fun, Alfie --=20 SGH in Hannover sucht eine "Hostmaster/in" bzw. "Systems Administrator/in" mit u.a. folgenden Eigenschaften: "In der Administration von Unix-Systemen und deren Dienste SMTP, HTTP, BOFH, DNS und SMB besitzen Sie umfassende praktische Erfahrung." -- dasr --A6N2fC+uXW/VQSAv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAf9a2MU96lewVKUIRAk9QAJsHnS/gMYEgDiHkJD4OpRSzoeVR0wCgilLS Fhoft/UkZqf6nyYDfKYrOjQ= =RuA+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --A6N2fC+uXW/VQSAv--