On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 02:26 +0100, Jens Seidel wrote: > Hi, > > I found the following typo which should be fixed by native speakers: > > $ grep -ri vunerab . > ./english/News/weekly/1999/32/index.wml:and no Debian packages are vunerable. > Announcements were also made about an > ./english/News/weekly/1999/33/index.wml:released</a>, to fix a denial of > service vunerability. Debian's cron package > ./english/News/weekly/1999/33/index.wml:not vunerable</a> to the buffer > overflow found in Red Hat packages. It is > ./english/News/weekly/1999/33/index.wml:vunerable, however, to an associated > problem, and a fix has been > ./english/security/undated/1samba.wml:<p>An exploit has been posted on the > internet and the vunerability is > ./portuguese/security/2001/dsa-093.wml:Wietse Venema informou que ele > encontrou uma vunerabilidade > ./portuguese/security/2002/dsa-122.wml:vunerabilidade é conhecido atualmente. > Essa vunerabilidade está > ./portuguese/security/2002/dsa-122.wml:<p>A vunerabilidade na zlib está > consertada na versão 1.1.3-5.1 do pacote > ./portuguese/security/2002/dsa-122.wml:devem ser atualizados para eliminar a > vunerabilidade da zlib. Seguem abaixo os pacotes > > It should be vulnerable instead of vunerable. > (I'm nearly sure about english but not portuguese.)
For what it's worth, "grep -rin" is usually a lot more helpful. :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
