Josip Rodin: > How exactly is <b> evil?
It is visual markup, in contrast to <strong> which is logical. And <b> is depreciated in HTML 4.0, which we supposedly following. > And why is <code> better than <tt>? For the same reason. > You should have just replaced it with <blockquote>, that would make the same > effect, although it would indent the right-hand side, too. Oh, you were using it to indent something? I didn't notice, I just saw an illegal <ul> and removed it. I didn't know it could be abused to indent stuff. BTW, <blockquote> isn't the same thing as indentation, to indent stuff you need CSS (something like <dl style="margin-left: 2em">), there is nothing like indentation in HTML, <blockquote> means that it is a block of quoted text, which I didn't see any of in the page. > Also, adding <P>\n still makes weblint/tidy barf, IIRC... Then it's broken. I usually try to minimize the changes in CVS, and thus adding a <P> on its own rather than changing a whole line to start with a <P> and possibly reformatting the whole paragraph of text is much better. > /me notes HTML is rather lame Only if used incorrectly. HTML with CSS is quite a powerful presentation language. -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law: http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html
