-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 <disclaimer> ~ I wasn't involved with the thread or discussion in question </disclaimer>
on 16/8/05 1:45 PM Jutta Wrage said the following: | The problem is, if it needs hours of discussion, just to change the | page and make it accessible again, that really sucks, Everyone can see: | Oh, lynx does not work, we have a problem - if one accepts that being a | problem. Either we want accesibilty, and then we do not discuss about | nothing going wrong or we do not and just take lynx in concern. There | are several reasons, why some people have to use lynx. Perhaps the need for a 'very long discussion' is that some people are very interested about accessibility and web standards and any quirks may be an interesting point of discussion to a certain breed of geek? | If you cannot see, why the need of a very long discussion about that | might hurt people extremly, I cannot do anything by that. I don't understand why it 'might hurt people extremely' - it got fixed, people had a discussion about it. Why is that extremely hurtful? I may just lacking information about the original discussion and that's why I don't understand it, but if it was fixed, I don't see the problem. - - Penny -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDAWZDGHUSCqMOwisRAv8sAKChbUQjqGku8GljJvzYM27QC1A1UACeLCFb +8kNxiewWVl+kKaz0RYwW6M= =PTCu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
