Russ Allbery dijo [Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:52:46AM -0700]: > If we happen to fall down this leg of the Trousers of Time, I would be > inclined to explicitly reinstate option A in any SC ballot options that > would make A consistent with the SC as revised. > > In practice, I think this specific outcome is unlikely in that I expect > that if people were willing to change the SC to be consistent with option > A, they'd just vote my option E. The most likely case where option A > would win but not option E is if option E failed to get a 3:1 majority and > then option A was the favorite among the remaining options, but in that > case the SC amendment in the third step would presumably also fail to > gather a 3:1 majority.
Ack, it makes perfect sense. So... I'll blame my obtuseness on the fact that 8hr timezone difference still accounts for a confused brain trying to get out of jetlag ;-)
