Kurt Roeckx dijo [Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:29:28PM +0200]: > > >> >What's the rationale for this one? > > >> > > > >> >I think it would make more sense to only configure the system to enable > > >> >the non-free-firmware component if the installer determines that > > >> >packages from that component are useful for the running system (or if > > >> >the user explicitly asked to do so). > > >> > > >> That's a fair point, my text was unclear here. Let's tweak it: > > >> > > >> "Where non-free firmware is found to be necessary, the target system > > >> will *also* be configured to use the non-free-firmware component by > > >> default in the apt sources.list file." > > >> > > >> Does that sound better? > > > > > >Is this something you want to adopt? > > > > Yes, I think it improves things. > > I've modified the vote page with what I think you wanted to change. > > Gunnar, do you also want this change in your text?
If it does not require the explicit approval of the sponsors, yes, I agree this text clarifies and makes better the text I proposed.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
