On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:26:51AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hey Wouter! > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 12:19:55PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > >On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:58:21PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> system will *also* be configured to use the non-free-firmware > >> component by default in the apt sources.list file. > > > >What's the rationale for this one? > > > >I think it would make more sense to only configure the system to enable > >the non-free-firmware component if the installer determines that > >packages from that component are useful for the running system (or if > >the user explicitly asked to do so). > > That's a fair point, my text was unclear here. Let's tweak it: > > "Where non-free firmware is found to be necessary, the target system > will *also* be configured to use the non-free-firmware component by > default in the apt sources.list file." > > Does that sound better?
Is this something you want to adopt? Would a non-free-firmware section in the archive be useful, so that other non-free software is not enabled by default? Kurt
