On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 09:38:52PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hi Kurt! > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 04:26:40PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 11:26:51AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> Hey Wouter! > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 12:19:55PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > >> >On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:58:21PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> >> system will *also* be configured to use the non-free-firmware > >> >> component by default in the apt sources.list file. > >> > > >> >What's the rationale for this one? > >> > > >> >I think it would make more sense to only configure the system to enable > >> >the non-free-firmware component if the installer determines that > >> >packages from that component are useful for the running system (or if > >> >the user explicitly asked to do so). > >> > >> That's a fair point, my text was unclear here. Let's tweak it: > >> > >> "Where non-free firmware is found to be necessary, the target system > >> will *also* be configured to use the non-free-firmware component by > >> default in the apt sources.list file." > >> > >> Does that sound better? > > > >Is this something you want to adopt? > > Yes, I think it improves things.
So can you send a signed message saying that? Kurt
